kaleok
Newbie
Moderator

Three key points for Pluto's classification as a dwarf planet

Pluto is no longer classified as a major planet and has been reclassified as a dwarf planet based on three main points:


The third criterion of the planet definition

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) revised the definition of a planet in 2006, with the third criterion stating that a planet must "clear its orbit of other objects." Pluto is located in the Kuiper Belt, an area filled with many icy small bodies. Pluto's mass and volume are insufficient to clear other small bodies near its orbit, thus it does not meet this criterion of the planet definition.


The discovery of Eris

In 2005, astronomers discovered Eris, a distant icy body with a mass comparable to or even greater than Pluto's. The discovery of Eris further proved that Pluto is not the only body in its region (the Kuiper Belt), prompting the IAU to revise the planet definition. If Pluto were defined as a planet, then similar bodies like Eris would also need to be classified as planets, leading to a sharp increase in the number of planets without significant differences between these bodies.


The physical characteristics of Pluto

Pluto's volume and mass are relatively small, with a diameter of about 2,376 kilometers, smaller than Earth's moon, and a mass only 0.2% that of Earth. Additionally, Pluto is primarily composed of rock and ice, has an extremely low surface temperature, and a thin atmosphere. These physical characteristics make Pluto notably different from other major planets (such as Earth and Mars).


In conclusion, because Pluto does not meet the IAU's third criterion for planet definition (clearing its orbit of other objects), and due to its distinct physical characteristics and environment compared to other major planets, it is no longer defined as a major planet but is classified as a dwarf planet.


175125886712965.webp

klboy
Newbie
1#

I think an additional point could be that its co-orbital core with its satellite needs to be within the primary star.

kaleok
klboy
6months ago

It's a bit difficult because Phobos and Deimos are much larger relative to Pluto. An 800-kilometer-diameter small moon with a 5-kilometer satellite would definitely have a co-orbital core inside the planet.

nobbkale
kaleok
6months ago

After checking, you'll find that Ganymede and Titan are both outside the planet, so this criterion indeed doesn't work.

wokerman
nexa
6months ago

you can you up,no can no bb

Login
{{error.username}}
{{error.password}}
or
Register
{{error.username}}
{{error.nickname}}
{{error.email}}
{{error.password}}
{{error.repassword}}
Forget the password
{{error.email}}
{{error.code}}
Reply:{{reply.touser}}
Edit
Allow cookies on this browser?

All cookies currently used by FreeTalkHub are strictly necessary. Our cookies are employed for login authentication purposes and utilise Google's one-click login functionality, serving no other purpose.